Paul Wells writes the following about Stephen Harper's threats against the Throne Speech:
On the other hand, Kevin Brennan wrote this about Jack Layton, who is resisting the amendments proposed by Harper and Duceppe:
Which leaves me feeling that Harper and Duceppe and playing a better tactical game than Layton is. If all opposition leaders behaved the way Jack Layton seems to be this week, there would be no difference between a Martin minority and a Martin majority. As far as I see it, Harper's push to make amendments to the throne speech is a smart play. As he pushes the point that this is a minority government, his notion that the other parties should be consulted becomes reasonable. In fact, I think that if the government falls tonight at 6:30, Harper would have a chance of forming a government without the stigma of close BQ collaboration. His stance would be, "Paul Martin has proven himself too arrogant to lead a government that reflects the wishes of other parties in this split Parliament. I can and will do that job." And, contrary to Martin's extra-constitutional assertions otherwise, we would not need to have another election immediately if the Liberals blow it tonight. |
.
|